Discover the truth about GCSE league tables

13th January 2006 at 00:00
What do GCSE league tables tell us about the kind of education pupils in our secondary schools are receiving?

They obscure more than they reveal, according to the most detailed analysis of data behind the tables yet carried out.

Our study of the results of 135 secondaries suggests the Government's rankings of the most rapidly improving schools is skewed towards recognising those which have recently introduced vocational courses.

Intermediate general national vocational qualifications are worth four GCSEs in the tables.

And the schools at the top of last year's government list of the most improved in England predominantly have pupils taking GNVQs in more than one subject.

Schools at the top of the most-improved list tend to obtain about three GCSEs for league-table purposes from GNVQs. For those in a control group of 47 secondaries, the average is about half a GCSE.

There is also some evidence to suggest that pupils find vocational courses much easier. Among the top 30 most improved schools, the average pass rate at C or better for GNVQ ICT was 83 per cent, compared to 39 per cent for GCSE maths.

Our research also confirms that the top most improved schools would fare much worse under a new government measure used to rank secondaries: the proportion of pupils gaining five or more top passes in subjects including English and maths.

Perhaps the most remarkable finding, however, relates to what subjects pupils are being offered in the most-improved schools.

On average, a pupil attending a most improved school is less likely to achieve a GCSE at grade C or above for academic science, or a European language than at a secondary in our control group. Many of the 100 most improved schools also had low numbers of pupils passing history and geography GCSE.

This finding is potentially devastating, as it suggests that league tables are an inadequate guide to schools' performances in subjects that many parents regard as of central educational importance.

The TES sought, under the Freedom of Information Act, detailed GCSEGNVQ results for 2005 from the Government's list of the 104 most improved schools in 2001-4, plus a control group of 60 schools. Responses were received from 135 secondaries overall. A paper providing a longer analysis of the results is available at or by email:

Roger Titcombe and Roger Davies

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today