Do we really want to pay governors?

20th November 1998 at 00:00
STEVE Devrell's solution to the problems of volunteer governing bodies (TES, October 30), which seem in his experience to attract only the pushy, sad or megalomanical is to professionalise the job, to pay governors.

His solution is professional governance of a "cluster" of schools with lay membership "kept to a minimum". I wonder if we might consider funding this solution?

A "cluster" is not a very specific term but we might think of five to 10 schools. Let's say, for England and Wales, 3,000 clusters. We need to establish the size of each unit (say eight to 12 governors), whether they will be paid on a full-time or part-time basis (presumably dependent on cluster size) and the rate of pay for "people who have proven ability in education and administration".

So some 3,000 clusters x 10 Pounds 30,000=Pounds 0.9 billion, just under a 1 per cent rise in income tax. With such a sum to spend on education, would the decision to spend it on school governors gain widespread support? I doubt that it would.

John Adams Chair National Association of Governors and Managers 21 Bennetts Hill, Birmingham

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today