Don't exclude lunch exclusions;Letter

4th June 1999 at 01:00
YOUR front-page headline (TES, May 21) "Exclude at midday only as last resort" was nearly the final straw.

We must keep this right as it is often the only way to avoid exclusion. Going home over lunchtime means the other children are safe from physical assault, the midday supervisors are allowed to do their job without verbal abuse and I, as head, might be able to sit down for five minutes before returning to teach for 50 per cent of the week.

In my opinion, it does not "exacerbate the problem" but can be a way to allow a child with emotional and behavioural difficulties to have a "good" morning and a reasonable afternoon without the very difficult lunch-time session "exacerbating" the problems of these troubled children.

I think most headteachers have already exhausted every other strategy. It is insulting to suggest we use it for our convenience.

Name and address supplied

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today