Don't let the facts impede homework stampede

31st January 1997 at 00:00
I have not read Michael Barber's research paper mentioned in the article "Booster effect of after-hours effort" (TES, January 17). But I suspect that not many politicians have read it either.

The warning by the authors of the report that "the size of its sample means that its findings cannot be considered conclusive" is not exactly what politicians want to hear - why let a few facts get in the way of a stampede to be the first party to launch a "more homework" crusade?

May I suggest an alternative vote-winner? Research carried out in this household, taking at least five minutes on Sunday morning, suggests that if you take a sample of 14 secondary schools (the same as the number used in the research) it can be shown that "successful" schools are to be found predominantly in leafy suburbs.

So the answer is simple - plant more trees.

PAM RUTTER 23 Chantry Road Moseley Birmingham

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today