Don't let the facts impede homework stampede

31st January 1997 at 00:00
I have not read Michael Barber's research paper mentioned in the article "Booster effect of after-hours effort" (TES, January 17). But I suspect that not many politicians have read it either.

The warning by the authors of the report that "the size of its sample means that its findings cannot be considered conclusive" is not exactly what politicians want to hear - why let a few facts get in the way of a stampede to be the first party to launch a "more homework" crusade?

May I suggest an alternative vote-winner? Research carried out in this household, taking at least five minutes on Sunday morning, suggests that if you take a sample of 14 secondary schools (the same as the number used in the research) it can be shown that "successful" schools are to be found predominantly in leafy suburbs.

So the answer is simple - plant more trees.

PAM RUTTER 23 Chantry Road Moseley Birmingham

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now