Doubtful on the wisdom of a shift to 'functional' skills

23rd April 2010 at 01:00

A number of recent developments should worry anyone concerned with the education and training of adults with low levels of accredited skills.

Many teachers and managers are sceptical of the move to Functional Skills: teachers can see that it doesn't meet the needs of many of their learners; managers can see that it costs more and that there will be major continuing professional development issues; and everyone fears that success rates will fall dramatically.

Meanwhile, a high proportion of those described as Neets have basic skills needs. Research shows that many older people have some literacy or numeracy skills gaps, and we know that offenders with the poorest skills are most likely to re-offend.

All this comes at a time when the overall funding for basic skills is under pressure. The funding "uplift" for literacy has been removed, and there is currently insufficient capacity for numeracy teaching to have even a hope of meeting the 2020 targets. A new administration will certainly have its work cut out.

Carol Taylor, Director of Operations, Niace.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today