The early years are crucial - let's not accelerate children's learning

19th March 2010 at 00:00

The QCDA report on the conflict between government targets and developmental aspects of the early years foundation stage (EYFS) makes an obvious point.

In less advantaged areas of the country, it is impossible for schools to provide what children need to make long-term progress while satisfying the short-term demands of School Improvement Partners, based on the Government's literacy targets for five and seven-year-olds.

Children's natural development can be supported by good teaching, but it can't be accelerated. I meet teachers torn between these conflicting demands. Should they do what's best for the child and go into special measures, or satisfy Ofsted and damage their pupils' chances of success in the long term?

Please God, the next government recognises that it can't have it both ways.

Sue Palmer, Independent literacy specialist and author of 'Toxic Childhood'.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today