Editing flaw

20th February 1998 at 00:00
Your editing of the letter from four members of the working group on the secondary science initial teacher training national curriculum (TES, February 6) gives the incorrect impression that we think that an A-level pass in physics, chemistry or biology is adequate preparation for a postgraduate certificate in education course which aims to train teachers to teach the subject at key stage 4. Indeed, our letter argued the opposite of this.

I find it hard to see how anyone could claim that standards of science teaching will be improved by attempting to train KS4 teachers to teach a subject in nine months on the basis of an A-level pass awarded several years previously at grade D or E.

JOHN LEACH School of education The University of Leeds

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now