Editor's Letter

26th February 1999 at 00:00
As long ago as 1978, HM Inspectors pinpointed trouble in the lower juniors. This month's report from the Chief Inspector (see page 5) still shows that eight and nine-year-olds are the group least likely to succeed.

Why? This is the exciting age when children are growing out of infancy, developing quirky senses of humour, having startling insights. It is also a crucial point in their education. If reading is not secure by age eight, children may fall permanently behind. Reasons for the Year 3-4 blackspot are not entirely clear. It could have to do with a change of school or key stage, or with a lack of focus by schools on those years in the middle.

Now the National Numeracy Project has shown that this doesn't have to happen (see page 8). Eight and nine-year-olds in the pilot showed greater progress than any other group. Again, we can't be sure why, but it could be because the scheme details a curriculum for each year rather than a four-year key stage, and builds in continuity from year to year.

It's good news and worth thinking about.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today