'Evil' tables must be destroyed

11th June 2010 at 01:00

I am extremely disappointed that the editor of The TES only recognises that a league table ranking "can" be unfair!

I am the headteacher of a primary school in challenging circumstances. We were recently inspected by Ofsted and awarded an "outstanding" grade. Yet the bureaucracy renders my school both as "great", "needing to maximise progression" and at risk of being "below floor targets" all at the same time.

The crude level 4 measure, on which primary league tables are based, is flawed and biased towards more affluent areas.

Children enter my foundation stage with ability levels well below those expected, so much so that we have had to develop an assessment tool which precedes the profile points. For many of my pupils, a level 4 grade at the end of KS2 is simply not expected and not achievable. However, this does not mean children haven't made excellent progress from a level w to a 3, or a level 1 to a high level 3 - but this, alas, counts for nothing in the tables.

Primary headteacher, Lincolnshire

(name and address supplied).

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now