Exam for the older would be wiser

21st September 2012 at 01:00

Both GCSEs and A levels need to be reformed but, in an era of limited resources, should we really be putting time and money into creating a new examination at 16-plus? From next year, students will be expected to remain in learning to age 17 and two years later to age 18. By 2015, the year the so-called EBac Certificate is set to be introduced, the idea of a leaving exam at 16 will have become an anachronism. The truly radical reform would be to replace our current examinations at 16 and 18 with an English Baccalaureate worthy of that name, which recognises achievements in both academic and vocational courses at age 18. Time to revisit the Tomlinson report of 2004.

David Andrews, Royston, Hertfordshire.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now