Exam for the older would be wiser

21st September 2012 at 01:00

Both GCSEs and A levels need to be reformed but, in an era of limited resources, should we really be putting time and money into creating a new examination at 16-plus? From next year, students will be expected to remain in learning to age 17 and two years later to age 18. By 2015, the year the so-called EBac Certificate is set to be introduced, the idea of a leaving exam at 16 will have become an anachronism. The truly radical reform would be to replace our current examinations at 16 and 18 with an English Baccalaureate worthy of that name, which recognises achievements in both academic and vocational courses at age 18. Time to revisit the Tomlinson report of 2004.

David Andrews, Royston, Hertfordshire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today