An experiment that failed

6th June 2003 at 01:00
IT was interesting to read the comments (TES, May 23) about key stage 2 English and maths Sats. As a KS2 science specialist I feel that the 2003 papers are also worthy of comment.

The widely accepted definition of science is that it is a broad body of knowledge as well as a way of working and thinking. In previous years the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority focused on the first half of this definition, realising the difficulty in assessing the practical element of science using pencil and paper. This year it focused almost exclusively on the second half. Simple scientific concepts were wrapped up in elaborately described investigations.

Did the QCA's efforts result in a science paper more suitable to the maths curriculum? The children I teach described the experience as "boring", with more boxes to tick than ever before. Hopefully the experience has not turned this entire cohort of young people off science forever.

Nancy C Bilderbeck

83 Warrington Crescent, London W9

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now