Expulsion pain

18th February 2005 at 00:00
The difference between managed moves and permanent exclusion is like the difference between having a root canal filling or extraction without anaesthetic ("Exclusion? That's just so 2004", TES, February 4).

Managed moves are not better than having more in-school specialist options, and no one claims they are. But at times of crisis, it is no solution to blame the school. Managed moves encourage long-term individual planning based on the child's social learning needs (not the punishment and rejection of permanent exclusion) and can include temporary and part-time alternatives as well as transfer to a new school. They can also increase family participation. So references to "revolving doors" and "passing the problem from one school to another" are misleading.

The article does not mention huge reductions in permanent exclusions where managed moves have been adopted. In Stoke-on-Trent, for instance, the numbers have fallen year on year from 73 to 17.

Your writer is right to be concerned about standards. An explanation of Inaura's recommended approach can be obtained by emailing poonam@inaura.net.

Adam Abdelnoor Chief executive Inaura the Inclusion Charity 65 Central Hill, London SE19

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today