Extra spending helps above-average pupils

4th April 1997 at 01:00
The latest American attempt to prove that there is a direct link between school spending and pupil achievement has produced a finding that no one had anticipated.

Extra spending does not appear to have a significant effect on the performance of children in the bottom half of the achievement range, but it does boost the scores of pupils who are above average in maths and reading.

The finding, which will dismay groups campaigning on behalf of disadvantaged children, has emerged from a study undertaken by William Fowler of the National Centre for Education Statistics.

William Fowler told the AERA conference that he had studied the composite maths and reading scores of 10,110 state school children who were tested at the ages of 14, 16 and 18 as part of the National Education Longitudinal Study.

He then compared their scores, which were collected between 1988 and 1992, with the spending levels in school districts.

Information on spending by individual schools in one state - Texas - was also examined, and background information on the children's socio-economic status was also taken into consideration.

William Fowler said that he had set out to try to prove that children who do not perform well on achievement tests are "more sensitive to higher expenditures" but he had found that the opposite appeared to be true. "Money seems to have some slight positive effect upon those students who scored above the median . . . if these results are consistently found, then the current operating assumptions in education may be profoundly altered," he said.

"The competitive position of the United States among other nations has often focused upon raising average achievement, presumably by raising minimum standards. However, if the achievement of students above the median score can be enhanced by additional expenditures, then a new strategy of funding may be in order."

A second paradox thrown up by William Fowler's study was that the individual school spending figure turned out to be less statistically significant than the district total spending figure.

But such apparent illogicalities merely demonstrate how difficult it is to tie down the links between spending and pupil attainment, a point that William Fowler acknowledges.

The next two challenges facing researchers, he believes, must be to produce better estimates of the sums spent on individual children and to produce more sophisticated statistical procedures for "disentangling socio-economic status and school resource levels".

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now