Faith in PIPS continues to grow

16th June 2000 at 01:00
FOLLOWING your recent news item (TES, May 12) I feel compelled to write to you regarding the reliability and validity of the Performance Indicators in Primary School baseline assessment.

Nearly two years ago we put a notice in The TES stating that the PIPS baseline assessment was the most reliable and valid.

We believe this to be true but there are another 90 baselines in England and we were unable to prove the truth of the statement since the reliability and validity of many are not known.

Every year we reassess a epresentative sample of pupils whom the teachers have already assessed. This gives us reliability figures over 0.9. We have also shown that the PIPS baseline has good predictive validity (up to 0.7 for Year 2). Is there any other baseline with better figures?

Finally, in its ruling (February 1999) the Advertising Standards Authority itself stated that "the PIPS project was the scheme that was most evidently underpinned by research".

Professor Peter Tymms

Director of the PIPS project

Durham University


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now