Is FE counting the cost of a quango crisis?

30th October 2009 at 00:00
Should we cut the FE quangos down to size?

It is a challenge to come up with useful metaphors for quangos, but, just maybe, these organisations are a bit like those exotic plants that the Victorians valued for ornamental purposes. Like Japanese knotweed, once thought of as looking good in a shrubbery, which is now viewed as so dangerously invasive by gardeners that its presence is treated with all the tolerance of a smoker in, well, almost any situation.

Quangos always seem a good idea at the time. Someone, after all, has to run things, so why not a quango offering that comforting mix of autonomy moderated by state control. Trouble is, they spread like wildfire: there are some 1,600 across the UK with a total combined budget of pound;64 billion and employing around 700,000 people, according to the Taxpayers' Alliance.

Calls by the UK Commission for Employment and Skills (UKCES, page 1) to cut further education's quality-improvement quangocracy down to size are, therefore, understandable and welcomed by many in the sector. But what is being proposed in their place? There is no disagreement about the need for quality control and enhancement in FE and to that end many of the functions performed by bodies - not all of them quangos but all publicly- funded - like the Learning and Skills Improvement Service, Lifelong Learning UK, the Government's IT champion Becta and the Institute for Learning are valid.

The point made by UKCES is whether we need to spend an estimated pound;130 million on all of these bodies when a customer-led quality-improvement system could do the job just as effectively and far more cheaply.

The commission suggests a system not unlike food labelling, which is controlled by the Food Standards Agency, where all the information is made available on a product to help people make informed descisions about what to buy. But surely that would require the creation of something like a Further Education Standards Agency to collate and, perhaps in some cases, generate the information, ensure that it is accurate, up to date and comparable, then, to disseminate it. And it would all come at a cost.

That said, the UKCES report is timely given the pressure to cut public spending. FE has it within its grasp to create a simple yet effective quality improvement system that serves both its business-like providers and their clients.

But what's the betting that this will involve the establishment of a quango?

Alan Thomson, Editor, FE Focus, E

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today