Fight for six-week holiday could end in the sack

16th March 2012 at 00:00
Strikes threatened as Nottingham plans to adopt a five-term year

The incentives of a six-week summer break and relative job security have long been dangled before potential teaching recruits. But in Nottingham, such perks of the job could soon be consigned to the history books.

The city looks set to turn into an industrial relations battleground as it becomes the first local authority in the country to propose switching all its schools from the traditional three-term year to a five-term structure.

While education secretary Michael Gove is in favour of a shorter summer break, many teachers in Nottingham are fiercely opposed to the move, which would affect 1,700 teachers at more than 70 maintained schools. In a ballot by teaching union the NUT, 88 per cent of members voted in favour of strike action; the NASUWT is preparing to follow suit.

But the Labour-led council is sticking to its guns. If the unions refuse to sign up to a collective agreement to alter the contracts of more than 4,200 employees, it says, they will be sacked and then offered a new contract under the altered terms. The message is clear: agree to the changes or you will be out of a job.

Under the proposal, the summer holiday would be cut to four weeks, with two-week breaks in October, December, March and May. The move would, the local authority argues, raise attainment and attendance, as shorter, more equal terms "can help children to be more motivated and less tired".

It also believes that the move would mean pupils "are less likely to forget what they have learned ... over a shorter summer holiday". Parents would benefit, the council suggests, from being able to spread holidays more evenly throughout the year, avoiding peak summer prices.

With a consultation period still ongoing, NUT regional secretary Ian Stevenson lashed out at the "aggressive" move by the authority to issue a formal notice, outlining its plans to dismiss staff who do not agree to the contract change without awarding them any redundancy money.

"It doesn't make sense legally or practically," he said. "For the recruitment of teachers, it will create havoc." The NUT has offered to cover the pay of any of its members who go on strike.

Graham Byers, the NASUWT's Nottingham branch secretary, insists that it, too, is prepared to take industrial action. "Teachers have mortgages to pay; it's a bullying tactic. They are not listening to the professionals," he said. "Recruitment and retention will plummet. A lot of teachers are saying that they are going to leave.

"They are experimenting with the lives of a whole cohort of children. At the end of term, we're already finding that children - especially those in the foundation stage and key stage 1 - are tired and getting ill. We will have that happening five times over. And exams will take place in May, when teachers should be on holiday in the new system."

Mr Byers added that the change would inconvenience teachers whose own children are schooled outside the city.

The move has been partially inspired by the success of the Djanogly City Academy in Nottingham, which already operates on a five-term model.

TES understands that, while voluntary-aided schools, foundation schools and academies in the city would not be obliged to follow suit, many would be open to the prospect of altering their term structure to match their local authority-supported neighbours.

The change was delayed until September 2013, to allow neighbouring Nottinghamshire County Council to consult its own members about making the move simultaneously. However, the council has now decided against implementing the proposal.

The other authorities that considered making the switch - Hull and East Yorkshire - have also opted not to press ahead, leaving Nottingham standing alone. But should the change get the green light, plenty of others will be monitoring the impact of the experiment with keen interest.

Factors in favour

According to Nottingham City Council, a five-term school year will:

raise attendance and achievement, as shorter and more equal blocks of learning time can mean children are more motivated and less tired;

raise achievement, because pupils are less likely to forget what they have learned or get out of the habit of learning over a shorter summer holiday;

allow better planning and delivery of the curriculum, because terms will be of more equal length;

offer flexibility, allowing family holidays to be taken outside the peak summer period and giving everyone a greater chance to save on holiday costs. Importantly, this could reduce the number of holidays taken during school time.

Canvassing opinion

The results of Nottingham City Council's consultation:

50.9% of respondents agreed with the proposals

45.6% did not agree

3.5% were undecided.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today