Filter out weak teachers;Letter

26th February 1999 at 00:00
ALAN Hall recounts how, as a young teacher, he had to teach next door to a colleague whose discipline was, seemingly, almost totally lacking (TES, February 12). I sympathise with his feelings as I too have been in this situation.

In my case the colleague was in the room above and the situation even more frustrating as I was being paid on what was then a scale one. The author of the noise which at times totally disrupted my classes was on scale four.

Sadly, unlike Alan Hall, I cannot claim to have entertained any feelings of sympathy for my colleague. I only remember, after 25 years or so, the deep resentment that such a person should have been allowed to become a teacher. I also remember conversations with others on the need for a Teachers' Council to act as a necessary filter.

One other difference I have with Mr Hall is that I never thought I should be paid more than my colleague, simply that he should never have been able to becaome a teacher.

I share with a majority of teachers, both then and now, the view that there should be a fixed, known framework for teacher remuneration applicable to all on entry to the profession.

Mr Hall thinks that he should have been paid more - but he would not have been the person to decide. Could he have been certain that whoever held that responsibility would have seen things as he did?

Is it not possible that the person in question might have passed over his qualities and favoured someone else whom Mr Hall saw as less effective than himself? Worse, that the incompetent colleague was favourably viewed by the powers-that-be and that he was considered no more than an arrogant upstart who should show more respect to his betters?

No, the solution to the problem is not to cast teachers' career prospects to the waves of subjectivity but to allow them to control entry to a known and agreed career structure.

I am convinced teachers would not let the incompetents that we all have met pass into the profession to wreak the havoc that they do and give ammunition to the populism of the chief inspector's reports.

W J Walder

107 Shalmsfor Street



Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today