Fingerprinting a necessity, but could create tension

29th September 2006 at 01:00
Teachers could face being fingerprinted to stay in their jobs under new legislation proposed this week.

Joining the new child protection vetting register will be compulsory if the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill, published this week, becomes law.

Currently, only people new to working with children or changing jobs need apply to Disclosure Scotland, which can require applicants to undergo fingerprint identification.

But, under the new bill, every person working with children in Scotland will have to be on the new register by 2012.

Since Disclosure Scotland was set up in 2002, around 4,000 of the 1.5 million applicants have had to be fingerprinted.

A spokeswoman for the Scottish Executive said that, in some circumstances, the tests are needed to be 100 per cent sure of identity.

She said: "There are occasions when someone might give someone else's details when arrested, or they might have very similar details to someone on the criminal justice register."

However, the spokeswoman said secondary legislation was planned to ensure that fingerprints are destroyed once identity is confirmed.

Greg Dempster, general secretary of the Association of Headteachers and Deputes in Scotland, said the fingerprint checks might be an unwelcome necessity.

He said: "It does, on the face of it, seem heavy-handed, but if we are going to have a robust system it may well be part of it.

"There will obviously be tension and irritation for some people about being fingerprinted, but I think it probably does need to be part of it."

A spokesman for the Educational Institute of Scotland said: "It is a concern if you are making people go through the same process as if you had been arrested, just so they can do their job. It will have to be handled extremely sensitively."

Judith Gillespie, development manager of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, warned that the vetting process would deter parents from coming forward to help.

Voluntary groups also fear that the additional cost of vetting checks could put smaller organisations out of business.

The bill requires Scottish ministers to keep a list of people banned from working with children and, for the first time, vulnerable adults.

It follows Sir Michael Bichard's report into how Soham murderer Ian Huntley was able to work at a school despite prior concerns about his suitability.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today