Five terms will not cure all ills

7th April 2000 at 01:00
YOUR report on Caroline Sharp's re-assessment of learning gains in the five-term year (TES, March 24) misses a vital point.

As far as this country goes, schools with five-term years are successful, but the roots of their success are not solely planted in calendar systems.

My research over the past three years for the International Education Leadership Centre has shown that the debate about calendar structures has become polarised, since no one calendar system is a panacea for improving learning quality in every circumstance.

The point is rather that schools tha have adopted five-term calendars have done so because they have open attitudes to management innovation. Good management systems, combined with improved use of school time generally, contribute to their success.

In May, the IELC is hosting a visit by educators from the Socorro school district (a year-round education district) in the USA, and a number of events are planned. Anyone who wants to become involved should contact me (

Trevor Kerry

Visiting professor


University of Lincolnshire and

Humberside, Lincoln

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today