Five terms will not cure all ills

7th April 2000 at 01:00
YOUR report on Caroline Sharp's re-assessment of learning gains in the five-term year (TES, March 24) misses a vital point.

As far as this country goes, schools with five-term years are successful, but the roots of their success are not solely planted in calendar systems.

My research over the past three years for the International Education Leadership Centre has shown that the debate about calendar structures has become polarised, since no one calendar system is a panacea for improving learning quality in every circumstance.

The point is rather that schools tha have adopted five-term calendars have done so because they have open attitudes to management innovation. Good management systems, combined with improved use of school time generally, contribute to their success.

In May, the IELC is hosting a visit by educators from the Socorro school district (a year-round education district) in the USA, and a number of events are planned. Anyone who wants to become involved should contact me (

Trevor Kerry

Visiting professor


University of Lincolnshire and

Humberside, Lincoln

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now