Freedom to collaborate

4th February 2005 at 00:00
John Chowcat misrepresents the views of the Secondary Heads Association on greater autonomy for schools and on the relationship between heads and the local authority (TES, January 21).

The freedoms we seek are not intended to re-create the market-based competitive world of the grant-maintained era, but to bring greater freedom from the over-accountability and excessive bidding, form-filling and bureaucracy that bedevils the work of heads in the current era.

That is why we support the Government's New relationship with schools, which was based on the SHA notion of intelligent accountability. And that is why we believe that the role of the local authority should be more clearly defined. The greater freedom that we demand has to be within a strong framework of collaboration of the sort that the best local authorities already promote.

The future we seek is not the unrestrained competition that John Chowcat describes, but one in which school autonomy and collaborative partnerships co-exist and the local authority finds a new, more strategic role, not least to ensure that the aims of the Children Act are fulfilled.

John Dunford General secretary Secondary Heads Association 130 Regent Road, Leicester

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today