Funds, flares and photographs;Post script;Letters;News amp; opinion

5th November 1999 at 00:00
THIS week I attended a consultation meeting at County Hall as chair of governors. Here we heard that property services were to decide how much of the money earmarked for property improvement and maintenance they would keep to cover core services.

The rest of the money would then be divided up according to a formula...not yet agreed. So the money we will receive to cover these costs is, say, equal to X.

For the pleasure of providing this service they will charge not simply the delegated sum but an additional percentage (a) to cover the possibility that there will not be a 100 per cent take up.

So , they give you X and charge you X + a. There seems to be a fundamental flaw in this equation. Just where do we get (a) from?

Some large schools will be winners, as the formula allows them a larger budget and so they already have a wider expertise base within the staff complement. For the majority it will mean even more pressure not only on the budget but on the head and the governors who try to make things work.

Lynda Steele

23 Parkway

Droitwich Spa, Worcestershire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today