Give us debate, not prejudice

7th January 2005 at 00:00
Alex Standish complains that geography has lost its bearings due to a narrowing of the geographical content of the curriculum. Bizarrely, he claims this is partly due to too much teaching of global issues and that this is a retreat from geography's intellectual foundations.

Standish should know that knowledge and understanding of the world has always been at geography's core: it has also had an interest in global citizenship, whether in the service of Empire, in the interests of international peace in the 1930s, or more recently concerned with development and environmental issues.

He offers no evidence for his claims that teachers are failing to keep up with a changing world and "turning away from the discipline's ideas and knowledge".

We need a serious debate about what geography can offer the 21st century - but this collection of half-baked theories and prejudice dressed up as fact is not it.

Dr John Hopkin. 30 Greenhill Road. Moseley, Birmingham

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today