Good practice sustained on an overdraft

5th April 1996 at 01:00
Our school was subjected to an inspection by the Office for Standards in education in February. The report states that "overall the school is efficient in the use of its resources and provides good value for money".

The first issue for action in the report was to "continue to maintain the significant good practice identified in this report". This would seem a reasonable suggestion, however, in the last year we achieved this "efficiency" and "good value" by overspending our allocation by Pounds 20,000 from our reserves.

Both music and special needs were singled out for praise in the report. We have two part-time teachers who lead in these areas. Next term I have to re-deploy the special needs teacher and the music teacher to take a class.

If the purpose of OFSTED is to raise standards it is nonsensical to ignore the effects of the erosion of school budgets.

However well we plan, organise, and manage there is a limit to our ability to compensate for reduced funding.

SARAH WORSTER Headteacher The Windmill first school Margaret Road Headington Oxford

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today