Heady debate

12th June 2009 at 01:00

Chris Woodhead thinks I'm still seeking closure because I failed to get a headship in the 1980s (Letters, June 5). Who'd have thunk it? The lone gunslinger of education is coming on like Hollyoaks.

No, I was never a head, but I did spend 17 years as a deputy, working with terrific colleagues in an exciting school - although, by Professor Woodhead's criteria, 90 per cent of pupils had the wrong genes.

His response reinforces the point I was making in my letter. I argued: "Don't focus on Woodhead: he'll personalise the issues." His reply was: "Don't listen to Francis; he applied for a headship and I turned him down." Does that mean he would have accepted my argument if it had been advanced by a head?

Chris Woodhead and I were part of a generation of English teachers who started out in comprehensives, and, as it happens, we've both produced memoirs reflecting on our careers and changes in schools. So it's easy to skip the gossip and concentrate on the argument. Readers of his A Desolation of Learning and my Comprehensive View will see the differences.

Paul Francis, Much Wenlock, Shropshire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today