Henry Tudor but no Iron Lady;Letter

5th March 1999 at 00:00
WHILE proposals for the history curriculum for 2000 may simply reflect classroom practice, this practice as described sounds odd (TES, January 19).

Why for example are the Tudors studied instead of the Stuarts? Is it because Henry VIII plays better to the back rows of desks?

And why is post-1945 history ignored. This raises the interesting prospect of a generation of school pupils who have never heard of Mrs Thatcher.

Keith Flett, Convenor, London Socialist Historians' Group, 36 Mitchley Road, Tottenham, London N17

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now