Henry Tudor but no Iron Lady;Letter

5th March 1999 at 00:00
WHILE proposals for the history curriculum for 2000 may simply reflect classroom practice, this practice as described sounds odd (TES, January 19).

Why for example are the Tudors studied instead of the Stuarts? Is it because Henry VIII plays better to the back rows of desks?

And why is post-1945 history ignored. This raises the interesting prospect of a generation of school pupils who have never heard of Mrs Thatcher.

Keith Flett, Convenor, London Socialist Historians' Group, 36 Mitchley Road, Tottenham, London N17

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today