Herts admonished on admissions

24th March 1995 at 00:00
Hertfordshire County Council has been censured for the second time in less than three years over the allocation of secondary school places, writes Clare Dean.

Edward Osmotherly, the Local Government Ombudsman, criticised as ambiguous some of the admissions criteria.

He said parents were not given good enough guidance on how the criteria operated and did not understand why their children were not offered places at the school of their choice. They were hampered in preparing their applications as the council did not even publish the supplementary criteria used by staff to decide who should go where.

Mr Osmotherly found maladministration causing injustice and recommended that the authority apologise to the five parents who complained to him and pay each Pounds 250.

His recommendation comes less than three years after a previous ombudsman's investigation found that some Hertfordshire admissions criteria were ambiguous and inadequate. That inquiry said there had been failures in the arrangements for informal appeals.

And Mr Osmotherly said: "Parents have an entitlement to know the criteria the authority will use in making decisions about the allocation of places." But although he recognised the bewilderment, suspicion and sense of injustice felt by the parents who complained, Mr Osmotherly did not recommend that the county now provide places at the schools of their choice. He said the authority had gone to great lengths to improve the internal consistency and fairness of the allocation process.

His concerns, however, centred on the allocation of places on the grounds of specific educational or other significant reasons.

Of the five complaints he received, four concerned requests for places at a single-sex girls' schools while the other was a request for a place at a mixed school in a different area of the county.

One parent had even moved house to get nearer to the school she wanted her daughter to attend only to be told she failed to get a place and did not meet the distance criteria.

Mr Osmotherly said it was impossible to know how the parents would have put their case had they been aware of the additional criteria council officials used for allocating places.

And he said: "The complainants will be left with a feeling of injustice since they will never know whether their children would have got the places they wanted but for the maladministration I have identified."

In another investigation, Ombudsman Patricia Thomas rejected a complaint against Tameside borough council from a parent who wanted to get his daughter into a single-sex school.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now