How we've changed

25th May 2001 at 01:00
Mitzi Farrelly, Senior effectiveness officer

The new system of performance management is a quantum leap in the monitoring and support of teachers. Appraisal was not a success first-time around. Its main purpose was to improve the quality of teaching and there is little evidence, locally or nationally, that this was the case. Curiously, though, appraisal training met with much more resistance than the training for this more rigorous system. It is a reminder of how much the professional climate has changed in the past decade.

It is hardlysurprising that appraisal proved to be so ineffective. The two-year cycle was out of step with other school management cycles. More often than not, teachers chose their own areas of focus and opted for areas of strength. Few schools adopted a line-management system and many of those who appraised teachers were not adequately trained to fulfil such a demanding role. On top of that, many review meetings that were meant to take place in the second year just didn't happen and there was no real link with continuing professional development.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today