Hypothetically disastrous

26th July 1996 at 01:00
Chris Woodhead, the chief inspector in recent speeches has quoted out of context from Peter Wood's book on primary teaching. The hapless teacher he insists on quoting is referring to the need to allow children to explore topics without being given the right answer by the teacher. On one occasion, at the Politeia debate, he actually asked members of the audience: "Would you like your child to be taught by this teacher?"

If Mr Woodhead is so violently opposed to children being allowed to speculate or explore hypotheses, can he explain to a bemused profession why we are teaching investigations in maths and science as part of the national curriculum?

ROWIE SHAW Director of Professional Services National Association of Head Teachers

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now