ICT - Web accuracy unravelled

16th April 2010 at 01:00

How accurate is Wikipedia, and just how much information can you trust on Twitter or Facebook? A Europe-wide project is set to develop a simple template which will allow academics and students to assess the credibility of information on the web.

User-generated content (UGC) on websites such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube is popular and topical, but to date there has been no foolproof way to judge whether it is reliable.

A survey carried out for Nature magazine in 2005 found that Wikipedia was as accurate as the Encyclopaedia Britannica, but citing from such web content is still regarded with suspicion by many academic institutions.

Now, funding of EUR400,000 has been awarded to a group of researchers from universities in the UK, Hungary, Spain, Germany, Portugal, Finland and Belgium. The initial project by the Concede group will involve the partners assessing which UGC sites are being used by universities.

In addition, they will examine UGC options to develop an easy-to-use tool to assess credibility, veracity, quality and provenance. They will also develop recommendations for academics and teachers to use UGC for educational purposes.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today