If only teachers did ignore brain difference theory

27th January 2006 at 00:00
In two weeks' time I am giving a talk to students at Roehampton university on boys' underachievement. Several will be aware of the argument that boys'

brains work in different ways to girls'. After all, how else can we explain why boys learn to read later and with more difficulty than girls?

In her article on this page last week Rachel Gallagher wrote of prominent psychiatrists and psychologists who have provided compelling evidence on brain differences between the genders. Yet, she says, teachers are not using the research to inform their teaching of boys. How I wish this was so.

I am hoping to convince students that brain difference theories do not help teachers. It could be an uphill struggle. A recent study by myself and colleagues at London Metropolitan and Newcastle universities found that 36 out of the 51 primary teachers interviewed said they differentiated between boys and girls for teaching andor management purposes. Several said they did this because boys are kinaesthetic learners.

So what shall I tell the students? I will explain to them that there is a strong voice in the boys' underachievement debate that uses biological difference to explain differences in gender and achievement. It is an effective voice because it offers simple solutions (for example, sit boys next to girls to enable girls' language skills to rub off on them). It is a misleading voice because it is selective in what it holds up as "incontrovertible" truths. Professor Simon Baron-Cohen makes it clear in his book The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain that he is not talking about boys' and girls' brains as such and stresses the significance of socialisation. It is an uninformed voice because teachers know that there are more character and ability differences within a group of boys (or girls) than between boys and girls.

It is accurate to claim that boys tend to learn to read later and with more difficulty than girls but this is not so simply explained by claiming that brains work differently according to gender. As the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development findings have shown so clearly, boys'

literacy problems are an international issue but some boys do well in relation to girls (including those in England). The key to success for all pupils lies in their social situation. What teachers can do is set aside calls to devise teaching approaches based on "brain difference" and respond to the research evidence that shows children learn best through exposure to a range of teaching and learning strategies.

Christine Skelton is professor of education at Roehampton university

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today