If the PM trusts teachers, why does he obsess about Sats' 'accountability'?

6th November 2009 at 00:00

Gordon Brown's comment that there is a need to retain national testing in primary schools for "clear accountability" is derisory on two counts.

First, it makes a mockery of the millions that have been spent by the Government since 1997 on initiatives and organisations to improve the quality of the teaching profession (including the Training and Development Agency for Schools, the National College for Leadership of Schools and Children's Services, Ofsted and so on).

Second, it suggests that these supposedly highly trained professionals are incapable of identifying and supporting pupils' learning needs, and measuring and reporting the progress in that learning through day-to- day classroom teaching activities.

In other words, why bother to train teachers in pedagogy and teaching strategies at all when the Government and its leader simply want teachers to have basic skills in preparing and coaching pupils to produce Sats outcomes?

Professor Bill Boyle, Educational assessment chair, School of Education, Manchester University.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now