30th August 1996 at 01:00
I agree with Jeff Hynds (TES, August 9) that the Office for Standards in Education seems to have misunderstood the relationship between phonological awareness and reading.

The research points to the most efficient readers analogising from known chunks in order to increase competence. For example, because a pupil knows the chunk "-and", she easily reads "sand" and "land". So when we perform diagnostic tests on pupils to see whether they have the foundational skills to make rapid progress in written language skills, we look at their ability to manipulate rhymes, to alliterate, and to segment into syllables.

We never ask pupils how many phonemes there are in given words because this is not a skill which is part of the reading process. The UCL Phonological Assessment Battery, soon to be published with norms by the National Foundation for Educational Research, similarly does not have any tests of the nature described in your article.

Phonological awareness, rightly understood, plays a very significant part in the development of written language skills.

EM TAYLOR Special needs teacher with the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea pupil support service 35 Bassett Road, London W10

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today