Imaginary journeys

7th November 2003 at 00:00
What's the difference between being half-way down a hill, and being half-way up it? Objectively speaking, none at all - it's the same spot in both cases, just as the same glass can be described equally truly as being half empty or half full. But subjectively there's all the difference in the world. Different wording conjures up different pictures, and it's the picture that matters.

Take the glass. Whether it's half empty or half full depends on whether it's on the way to being empty or being full. You have to imagine a little scene in which the content is changing, and you do this even if it's not in fact changing. We just like to think in terms of change when we're measuring.

It's the same with positions on the mountain side. In this case we could describe it as "half-way between the top and the bottom" - a static description. But that's a bit of a mouthful, and we usually take a dynamic approach. This involves an imaginary journey that would take us there; we would normally say "What's that little blob half-way up?" but might even use "half-way down" if we were planning an expedition starting from the top.

These imaginary journeys crop up all over the place. As usual, the grammar offers a writer (or speaker) a choice and each of the alternatives has a different effect which the writer should be aware of. Each choice is an invitation to a different imaginary journey, with a different direction.

This choice can often show where the writer's sympathies lie. For example, take the choice between "come" and "go", which shows how self-centred we are. Basically "come" is for movement towards the speaker, so we say "They came to me", never "They went to me". However, we often put ourselves in the hearer's shoes ("They came to you"), and we can even pretend to be in a third person's shoes. If we're on her side we say "They came to her", but we can take a more neutral point of view by saying "They went to her".

Here's a quick list of other words which force us to choose where we stand:

* bring or take? This is just like coming and going - they can bring something to me, but they can't take it to me.

* left or right? If you tell me to move to the right should I move to my right or to yours?

* behind or in front? Is it behind the table as seen from where you are, or from where I am?

* the road to or from London? Are we taking London as the start or as the end of our imaginary journey?

We could go on, and any class could come up with other examples.

Richard Hudson is professor of linguistics at University College, London Geoff Barton is headteacher of King Edward VI School, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today