Imperial past can't be metric

12th March 2004 at 00:00
I read your poster about Mr Brunel with interest (TES, February 27) and was pleased that the fashion of most television history programmes, whereby metric terms are used for the sake of it, was not followed.

This obsession with metrication is infuriating when the persons depicted would only have used imperial measurements.

How pleasing, then, that you define broad gauge and narrow gauge railways, the distance from London to Bristol and other lengths in the terms which were used at the time and still are.

The worksheets, however, are different. We still use imperial measurements for road (and rail) distances and for speeds. Is it necessary to confuse children by using terms which are outside their daily experience? Or am I being cynical in thinking that to be the reason? Traditional measures must be undermined and confused children are "a price worth paying".

Is this a TES idea? Or are you following government guidelines? Education and propaganda may be getting mixed up.

DL Stephens

32 Great North Road




Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now