Implementation not policy wrong

11th December 2009 at 00:00

There has been widespread misinterpretation of the latest Scottish Council of Economic Advisers' report. Its conclusion - "the council is sceptical that the simple objective of reducing class size as a method of improving teaching, will prove sufficient" - is correct.

Where class-size reductions have been pursued without taking care to maintain teacher quality, they have tended to fail. However, this does not mean the Government's policy of reducing P1-3 classes to 18 or fewer is wrong.

As a member of Michael Russell's working party on education policy when he was shadow education minister, I reviewed the economic implications of class-size reduction and the research evidence was (and is) clear and robust: classes of 18 or fewer for P1-3 have significant and sustainable economic, educational and social benefits, up to and including entry to the labour market.

It is quite legitimate to question policy implementation, but that does not mean the policy is wrong.

Neil Kay, economics department, Strathclyde University.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today