Improve assessments or 5-14 failure will be repeated

20th March 2009 at 00:00

I agree with Lindsay Paterson's comments about national assessments, in his critique of the current reforms (March 6). These have been a root cause of the failure of 5-14 to be taken as seriously as it should have been at the later levels.

A growing number of parents are becoming aware that their child may be struggling because they lacked enough quality at the previous level, a scenario many teachers are acutely aware of.

Unless assessment under the new curriculum is more robust than its 5-14 counterparts, I fear its structure will worsen the situation. Why? There are, in the main, four levels of attainment up to P7 as things stand, but ACfE implies mainly two. So there will be much broader levels, with implications for the assessment to be more thorough and reliable than the 5-14 national assessments have been to date.

However, there is room for improvement: if we can get children to be as fluent as possible with reading and numbers, they will tend to show excellence in any curriculum.

Tom Renwick, Maths on Track, Glasgow.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now