'Incompetent' teacher must do her sums again

7th February 2003 at 00:00
A MATHS teacher sacked for serious professional incompetence will be allowed to continue to teach as long as she completes a refresher course, a General Teaching Council for England hearing has ruled.

The hearing was told that Elizabeth Pownall, 56, was sacked from Dayncourt school in Radcliffe-on-Trent, Nottingham, after she failed to satisfy an inspector's review of her teaching capabilities.

Mrs Pownall joined the school, now a specialist sports college, in September 1992 and was appointed head of maths.

Headteacher Philip Clarke said problems with her teaching became apparent in 1996 when an Office for Standards in Education report showed a "serious negative" for the mathematics department.

He said that by April 1999 it had become clear that her teaching was not improving and a decision was made to call in a local authority inspector.

When asked why her "incompetence" as a teacher was not detected earlier, Mr Clarke said: "If I can use the analogy of the Titanic, the ship became holed some time after 1992 but, because of the experience of the staff in the maths department at the time, it managed to sail on."

The problem only became apparent when experienced staff had been replaced by inexperienced teachers.

John Drydon, an inspector at Nottingham education authority, was asked to complete four reviews of Mrs Pownall's competence between March 2000 and October 2001. "There were both weaknesses in the teaching and leadership of Mrs Pownall," he said.

Mr Drydon said he had observed her teaching a Year 7 class, who were in the top set, multiplication by 10. "To multiply whole numbers by 10 is not what you teach the top set of maths in Year 7. She even finished the lesson by doing mathematical hangman. Her judgment that this was an acceptable way to end a lesson was not good - particularly since I was there.

"She also lacked consistency. On some occasions she forbade talking in class; on others even I was distracted by some pupils talking."

He said that after each review, improvements were outlined on how Mrs Pownall could improve. "After each review it was my opinion that she had not attained a satisfactory improvement in her teaching. In my view the key issue was whether the children had improved their learning in her lessons and they had not."

Mrs Pownall had not responded to suggestions made to her, and although being advised to visit another school's maths department, she only did so once.

Liz Paver, chair of the disciplinary panel, said the facts did constitute a case of serious professional incompetence. She said Mrs Pownall would be allowed to continue teaching if she successfully completed a refresher course within two years .

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?

Subscribe

To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today