Inspectors 'not up to the job', MPs told

5th March 2004 at 00:00
Too many colleges are being put under the microscope by inspection teams that are not up to the job, MPs will be told next week.

A "significant number" of associate inspectors and a few lead inspectors do not possess the skills and experience required to pass judgment on the effectiveness of colleges, a report says.

The allegations are made in a submission from the Association of Colleges, to the education and skills' select committee which has listed 16 key points for MPs to consider.

Judith Norrington, AoC director of curriculum and quality, said: "It appears that from speaking to our members that their experience of inspection quality is varied. Some are extremely well conducted by experienced inspectors and other inspections have sparked concern.

"We also know that there are some areas that are not assessed because there are not enough qualified people to carry out an inspection of that particular area."

The AoC also told the committee: "We are concerned that the criteria for the grades for leadership and management appear sometimes to be inconsistently applied.

"Colleges should be judged with reference to the performance of similar colleges and not against those with a very different profile."

The committee will be taking formal oral evidence from David Bell, the chief inspector of schools, on Monday in its biannual scrutiny of the Office for Standards in Education.

In written evidence, the AoC says that the standards of inspectors have given colleges cause for concern, and that in some areas there have not been enough inspectors to carry out the job.

The report adds: "The large and vital contribution made by many colleges to widening participation, combating social exclusion and delivering the objectives of Success for All, is rarely reflected in the grades for such colleges.

"The measures for judging successful outcomes of student learning in further education are too crude. It is vital that ways of measuring the 'value added' to all learners are introduced."

It adds: "The time is right to question whether inspection in its current intensive and costly form is an effective way of making further improvements."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today