Inspectors 'not up to the job', MPs told

5th March 2004 at 00:00
Too many colleges are being put under the microscope by inspection teams that are not up to the job, MPs will be told next week.

A "significant number" of associate inspectors and a few lead inspectors do not possess the skills and experience required to pass judgment on the effectiveness of colleges, a report says.

The allegations are made in a submission from the Association of Colleges, to the education and skills' select committee which has listed 16 key points for MPs to consider.

Judith Norrington, AoC director of curriculum and quality, said: "It appears that from speaking to our members that their experience of inspection quality is varied. Some are extremely well conducted by experienced inspectors and other inspections have sparked concern.

"We also know that there are some areas that are not assessed because there are not enough qualified people to carry out an inspection of that particular area."

The AoC also told the committee: "We are concerned that the criteria for the grades for leadership and management appear sometimes to be inconsistently applied.

"Colleges should be judged with reference to the performance of similar colleges and not against those with a very different profile."

The committee will be taking formal oral evidence from David Bell, the chief inspector of schools, on Monday in its biannual scrutiny of the Office for Standards in Education.

In written evidence, the AoC says that the standards of inspectors have given colleges cause for concern, and that in some areas there have not been enough inspectors to carry out the job.

The report adds: "The large and vital contribution made by many colleges to widening participation, combating social exclusion and delivering the objectives of Success for All, is rarely reflected in the grades for such colleges.

"The measures for judging successful outcomes of student learning in further education are too crude. It is vital that ways of measuring the 'value added' to all learners are introduced."

It adds: "The time is right to question whether inspection in its current intensive and costly form is an effective way of making further improvements."

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now