It's no myth: superior O-level proves the system needs a rethink

20th November 2009 at 00:00

Adrian Elliott's article ought to have been based upon an in-depth analysis of exam papers, in a range of different subjects. Instead, it is just too vague and anecdotal.

If you have not read or spoken a word of French since your O-level, a nine-year-old may actually have a better knowledge of French than you do, but that does not, in itself, prove that GCSE French is harder than the old O-level paper.

However, when a group of modern young people experienced what it was like to be at a grammar school in the 1950s on Channel 4's That'll Teach 'Em, some said, quite openly, that they thought the old O-level papers were much more difficult than today's GCSE papers. As this group of youngsters were able to make valid comparisons, I would have thought that their opinions were worth listening to.

the hippo

From the forums (

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now