It's no myth: superior O-level proves the system needs a rethink

20th November 2009 at 00:00

A sensible and vigorous debate about the fashionable notion of evidence-based practice is long overdue. For those wedded to the naive hope that it is possible for "objective" research evidence to feed into educational policy-making, free from politicised distortion, recent experience must give major pause for thought.

We have recently witnessed the extraordinary spectacle of Professor Robin Alexander's Cambridge Primary Review report being rejected out of hand by a government in chronic "evidence denial", before the ink was barely dry from the printing presses. We must also be very cautious about accepting at face value soundbite headline reports of allegedly scientific research, embracing instead a critical perspective on the taken-for-granted assumptions about reality that routinely underpin every research methodology.

  • Dr Richard House, Research Centre for Therapeutic Education, Roehampton University.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now