The jury is still out on academies

4th August 2006 at 01:00
The Government's academies programme is flourishing. Next month, the number will almost double. Parents welcome them and millionaires, be they Christians or car dealers, seem cheerful enough about spending theirpound;2 million in private sponsorship.

But some myths must be dispelled. The shiny new buildings are not, for the most part, replacing failing schools as ministers have claimed. Not one of the 18 due to open this autumn is officially classed as failing, as the investigation we publish today (pages 6-7) shows. Our analysis last year reached a similar conclusion. Teachers are understandably indignant when politicians dismiss as "failing" schools that inspectors say are making good progress or have "many strengths".

Yet if the new schools bring much improved education for children in some of the poorest parts of the country, few people will argue. Why, as one academy head said recently, shouldn't the most deprived children be taught in the best buildings and the best schools?

At present, though, there is precious little evidence that ministers and the academies' founders will realise their dreams. Alan Johnson, the Education Secretary, is putting a brave face on a government-commissioned report from PricewaterhouseCoopers which shows that the differences between academies and other similar schools are small. Test results at some are worse than at the schools they replaced. Innovative teaching methods - one of the reasons for giving academies more freedom than other state schools - have not worked.

Worryingly, the proportion of pupils in academies eligible for free school meals fell, in some cases sharply, between 2002 and 2004. A better mix of pupils in inner-city schools would help both teachers and pupils. But if the academies become middle-class enclaves that turn away the very pupils they were designed to help, the Government will have lost the argument - at a cost ofpound;5 billion to the taxpayer. Mr Johnson is right when he says that parents should not have to accept failing local schools. Neither he nor anyone else knows yet whether the academies will provide the answer.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today