The jury is still out on the benefits of an early start

10th October 1997 at 01:00
Research into different ways of educating four-year-olds must be considered very carefully. A one-sided presentation of anecdotes and the selective reporting of investigations ("Summer discount", TES September 26) does not help.

The evidence for and against an early start is not at all clear-cut. This became clear in a review of the literature on the numbers of terms at school that I carried out for the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority recently.

Probably the strongest evidence in favour of an early start comes from our own work within the project at Durham. It has shown the very great strides made by pupils of all ages during the reception year. Further, we have just reported evidence for the positive impact of effective reception classes on the progress made by pupils two years later. But we are not complacent. This is a complicated area and the jury is still out. Research has a long way to go before it can make definitive statements in this area - if it ever will.


Durham University

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now