The jury is still out on the benefits of an early start

10th October 1997 at 01:00
Research into different ways of educating four-year-olds must be considered very carefully. A one-sided presentation of anecdotes and the selective reporting of investigations ("Summer discount", TES September 26) does not help.

The evidence for and against an early start is not at all clear-cut. This became clear in a review of the literature on the numbers of terms at school that I carried out for the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority recently.

Probably the strongest evidence in favour of an early start comes from our own work within the project at Durham. It has shown the very great strides made by pupils of all ages during the reception year. Further, we have just reported evidence for the positive impact of effective reception classes on the progress made by pupils two years later. But we are not complacent. This is a complicated area and the jury is still out. Research has a long way to go before it can make definitive statements in this area - if it ever will.


Durham University

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today