Keep an open mind on literacy;Letter

26th June 1998 at 01:00
It would be a pity if Sue Palmer's negative comments in her review of Diane McGuiness's book Why Children Can't Read and What We Can Do About It (TES, June 12) dissuade primary teachers from exploring this most interesting and cogent source of evidence about the alphabet and learning to read it.

McGuiness's claims regarding the evidence upon which her approach is based should not be dismissed so lightly ("highly selective research evidence").

Primary teachers, like professionals in medicine and other disciplines, are under increasing pressure to demonstrate to the public that they know what they are doing. The first three years of schooling are probably the most important in a child's life and becoming literate is certainly the most important element in these years.

By holding fast to the line that the National Literacy Strategy has all the answers and any evidence that challenges its underlying assumptions should be dismissed, Sue Palmer gives the unfortunate (and doubtless wholly misleading) impression of being a bigot rather than an open-minded seeker after truth.

Chris Godwin The Dutch House Pangbourne Road Upper Basildon Berkshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today