Learning styles are hardly 'nonsense'

10th August 2007 at 01:00
In your article "Style without substance" (TES, July 27), rather than rubbish the learning styles approach used by many teachers ("from a neuroscientific point of view it is nonsense"), what Baroness Greenfield should admit is that so far, neuroscientists and psychologists have failed to find a scientific basis for what teachers observe every day that learners learn best in many ways. Instead of denying that people have preferred learning styles, she and her colleagues should explore these differences and look for possible reasons.

"Learning styles" is about understanding how individuals find it easy to learn and what they find hard, and then working with them to create well-rounded learners competent visually, verbally, kinaesthetically sometimes presenting work in their preferred learning styles to generate success, and sometimes challenging them to tackle the approaches they struggle with.

Roger Broadie


Broadie Associates Ltd, Chatteris, Cambs

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today