Less choice as schools choose

11th July 2003 at 01:00
The distinction between aptitude and ability necessarily concerns the Philip Hunter, the official adjudicator (Platform, 19). But what is the point of allowing state-funded schools to select some of their pupils at all? At least grammar schools had a rationale. They were specialist schools, specialising in the most academically able. Most became comprehensive because parents preferred to choose equal opportunity for their children rather than to be chosen (or not) for a privileged education on the basis of tests which unfairly wrote too many off.

Formal banding schemes aimed to ensure balanced intakes to give all children a chance to achieve their potential whatever their school. They also constrained parental choice. But partial selection by some schools tilts the level playing field, still leaves schools, not parents, choosing and adds unnecessary complexity and anxiety to secondary transfer.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now