Less choice as schools choose

11th July 2003 at 01:00
The distinction between aptitude and ability necessarily concerns the Philip Hunter, the official adjudicator (Platform, 19). But what is the point of allowing state-funded schools to select some of their pupils at all? At least grammar schools had a rationale. They were specialist schools, specialising in the most academically able. Most became comprehensive because parents preferred to choose equal opportunity for their children rather than to be chosen (or not) for a privileged education on the basis of tests which unfairly wrote too many off.

Formal banding schemes aimed to ensure balanced intakes to give all children a chance to achieve their potential whatever their school. They also constrained parental choice. But partial selection by some schools tilts the level playing field, still leaves schools, not parents, choosing and adds unnecessary complexity and anxiety to secondary transfer.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today