Let teachers decide the canon

11th August 2006 at 01:00
Tabloid headline writers feel a warm glow at the mention of a literary canon. What better way for Alan Johnson, the Education Secretary, to make his midsummer mark than by announcing that a prescribed list of books will remain? Debate, perhaps, about whether Conrad and Swift are an alluring prospect for young teenagers but none about the need for schools to teach their pupils classic literature.

But why have a list at all? The original proposal from the Government's curriculum advisers was simply that teachers should pick works written before, during and after the 20th century. That made sense. A canon should change all the time. Some old books should disappear to make way for new ones. What matters is that pupils sample a selection of good books, old and new. Teachers don't need politicians to tell them that.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now