Let them pay governors

4th February 2000 at 00:00
It is almost 25 years since Margaret Thatcher made her pledge to "roll back the areas of decision by government".

No one - not even Thatcher herself - knew then just how radical that soundbite would prove. It triggered a steady dismantling of the local authority system in favour of individual and corporate management.

Those who also expected paternalism to die were to be bitterly disappointed; nowhere more so than in education and, in particular, colleges. Here, successive Secretaries of State have imposed codes and regulations as binding as a straitjacket.

The cheek of it is that ministers have expected volunteer armies of governors to perform duties once administered by highly paid executives. Certain governors should be paid in line with their duties. Power has been pulled to the centre and responsibility pushed to the edge. As a 'TES' national survey shows, governors are expected to behave like officers while being treated like squaddies.

There is a contradiction in both Thatcherism and Blairism: they want control taken out of the hands of "professionals" and given to people in the "ral world": business leaders, parents and the community. But their governments will not let go. Everything from cashflows to the curriculum is capped and controlled.

Small wonder then that our survey reveals a 12 per cent shortage of governors nationally. Around one-third of the shortfall is because colleges are holding out on appointments until the full impact of the new regulations is understood.

This is precisely the problem. What a preposterous position to leave colleges in. If this is the Third Way, it is a confused and confusing way. For better or worse, majority representation by business leaders on college boards has been abolished. But questions about the new structure of corporations have yet to be answered. College after college in our survey welcomed democratisation of boards but bemoaned the diktat to cut the size of business interests.

Alongside the FE reforms and the Learning and Skills Bill, ministers should consider how to give much more local discretion over board membership and payment of small emoluments. Otherwise it could just be faced with an army of deserters.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today