Let's take Ford's curriculum argument up a gear

6th January 2012 at 00:00

Carole Ford's recent analysis of the problems with Curriculum for Excellence is absolutely accurate. It shows that many in the teaching profession have still not engaged with its philosophy and methodology, preferring to retain a system that rejects interdisciplinary learning, rejects "confident" and less able pupils while celebrating those who have mastered the 3Rs - read, remember and regurgitate.

What percentage of our successful pupils make another "Rs" of their first year in further education? When will we recognise the reality that today's young people will not change to fit the system or "comfort zone", as Carole calls it. Perhaps, heaven forbid, we have to change the system.

As has been discussed many times in these pages, "Curriculum for Excellence" is a misnomer. It should be called "How people learn, as recommended by independent, international research that has been available to Scottish teachers for 40 years". Are we really still rejecting this?

Gordon Smith, former head of Jordanhill Primary, and a former president of AHDS.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now