21st April 2000 at 01:00
THE POOR formulation of the draft regulations on teacher and headteacher appraisal produces a legal absurdity.

The situation will be created where a headteacher or teacher governor could be both litigant and defendant in the same case.

If a head or teacher governor is dissatisfied with their appraisal, they can ask for a review by a nominated governor.

If they are dissatisfied with the review officer's decision and take the case to an employment tribunal, the goerning body (of which they are members) will be the defendant.

There is no mechanism for removing them from the governing body so if they do not resign, they would be in the uncomfortable position of sitting on both sides of the fence at once.

Could be painful but at least they'd have the consolation of knowing that they'd certainly had their day in court!

Jane Phillips

Independent governor

trainer and consultant

Elstree, Hertfordshire

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now