Letters extra: ICT choice missing

30th March 2001 at 01:00

I am the ICT co-ordinator at our primary school and have received a copy of the ICT in Schools 2001 survey.

It seems the Government is trying to prove that the money invested in ICT has had either a substantial or littlenone impact on the curriculum.

I assume this because question 3 about how beneficial ICT isnbsp;has a misprint in that the middle column is missing. The two option columns are substantial or littlenone. There is obviously a middle column missing offering an in-between option. As it stands one has to make a judgment that ICT has either had a substantial impactnbsp;or littlenone.

One could surmise that the whole point of the survey is to prove that ICT has had a substantial impact, but wouldn't that be a little too cynical? What do you think?

Adrian Joice
Newland Street St John's CE primary school, Hull

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now